Poll: Why did The Wallabies lose?
October 9th 2007 23:00
A question on par with "Where did the time go?"
Answerable but still a puzzle.
...just to let you know...that I really don't care that we lost. Much. Any more. Sort of. I will always love what The Wallabies stand for.
Yes, even without Stephen Larkham.
...it's the choice of players and the decisions the ARUsless make that bug me.
This post...other than being an all important poll...is a lead up to this post;
Please note, this week's posts are pre dated, so if you read this post, as soon as or near to time published, the post linked to above won't be available until 9:30am 10/10 AEST. Which is soon, so while you're waiting....
**********
NB:
The Rucks and Rolls polls adhere to the strict guidelines of A Poll o' Creed.
Apologies for not responding to any comments left.
I'm currently tracking anyone wearing white-with-a-splash-of-red jerseys .
I'm in the mood to change the colours around.
Answerable but still a puzzle.
Mort(ified)lock and Con(fusio)nolly
...just to let you know...that I really don't care that we lost. Much. Any more. Sort of. I will always love what The Wallabies stand for.
Yes, even without Stephen Larkham.
...it's the choice of players and the decisions the ARUsless make that bug me.
This post...other than being an all important poll...is a lead up to this post;
Please note, this week's posts are pre dated, so if you read this post, as soon as or near to time published, the post linked to above won't be available until 9:30am 10/10 AEST. Which is soon, so while you're waiting....
**********
NB:
The Rucks and Rolls polls adhere to the strict guidelines of A Poll o' Creed.
Apologies for not responding to any comments left.
I'm currently tracking anyone wearing white-with-a-splash-of-red jerseys .
I'm in the mood to change the colours around.
| 43 |
| Vote |
Add To: 
Subscribe to this blog
